| Where Have We Seen That Shape |
|
|
|
| Written by Angel | |||||||||||
| Tuesday, 11 November 2008 | |||||||||||
|
Where Have We Seen That Shape Before?
What happened at 911 is an invisible phenomenon and people have a need to see before they believe. In trying to understand something big we often need to look at something very small. So we look at what is happening inside a tiny bubble to make the large 911 phenomenon visible. Within some bubbles there occurs a process known as cavitation. Cavitation is a well studied phenomenon but it is still not completely understood. As an introduction it would be best to view the following you tube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR0YBAhY2PQ The reason for zero gravity is to study cavitation in a nicely spherical drop that doesn’t droop with the pull of gravity. Cavitating bubbles experiencing gravity have a geometry slightly different. Also a cavitating bubble near a flat or convex surface behaves quite differently. The nice spherical shaped cavitating bubble in near zero gravity is the most reasonable place to begin analysis.
Electrical discharge with a high voltage of 40 kV injected plasma inside a drop which created superheated water vapor bubble within the drop. In this article the authors present a series of pictures at a frame rate of 12,000 per second.
The geometry of the initial bubble has changed from a sphere to a toroid. The micro bubbles are just smaller versions of the original bubble.
This series of frames from the article show the microjet and a slower counter jet that appear after several cycles of implosions followed by expansions. The tiny bubbles also send out tiny jets.
Dr. Kenneth Suslick of University of Illinois uses ultrasound to create cavitating bubbles. See his report titled: THE CHEMISTRY OF ULTRASOUND (Suslick’s report) One of his interests is the cavitating bubbles located near extended liquid-solid interfaces. There are two distinct phenomena: microjet impacts and shockwaves. Whenever the cavitating bubble is near a boundary the asymmetry of the cavity collapse changes the geometry of the cavity. The accelerating microjet heads toward the boundary with a velocity upwards of hundreds of meters per second creating enormous energy densities at the site of impact. The lower wave frequencies results in more extensive damage which can be severe on the boundary surface. Included in Suslick’s report is the following microcimemagraphic of a cavitating bubble near a solid surface. The surface get bombarded with a double whammy of a force.
The geometry has changed from the sphere to a toroid and then a teardrop with damage taking place at the point of the teardrop which points directly to the boundary. Also if the boundary is convex, the damage is more severe. This is a picture of cavitation damage to a boat propeller:
Now it is time to compare the peculiar phenomenon of bubble cavitation to the collapse of the World Trade Centers. Please view the following video of the initiation of the collapse:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2002503302503479990
At 03 there is evidence of an implosion just like a cavitating bubble imploding.
A fraction of a second later while the implosion continues, another spot of intense heat sets off a blaze of fire within the circle.
A fraction of a second (by 04) the intense blaze is now a flash of light like that flash of light witness with cavitating bubbles. While the spot was the only one captured by the camera, there well may have been other such smaller bubbles like that seen when a shock wave initiates in a cavitating bubble, many smaller cavitating bubble are created.
There has even been discovered cavitation damage under the WTC’s. Reported to have been caused by glaciers 20,000 years ago, the potholes are more likely the damage caused by the destruction of the towers. This recent news article has circulated regarding the finding of a glacier pothole beneath ground zero of the World Trade Center. According to the article, geologists claim the depression was created by a glacier 20,000 years ago. The original engineer, George Tamaro, in charge of the construction of the slurry walls for the bathtub or the underground portion of the world trade center complex had some interesting facts about the geology of the area. For about 15 to 30 feet below the street level the ground is fill. Below that is glacial outwash sand and silt. Below that is glacial till decomposed rock. So there is evidence that slow moving glaciers were active in this area 20,000 years ago. See forum admin (SHR) message: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message613795/pg2 What is interesting is that about 70 feet down is bed rock of Manhattan schist which is composed of layers of mica and quartz. Now much is made of the 40 foot pothole, but pictures show that it is not the only depression as the area surrounding the pothole is weakened by vertical holes coinciding with the top layer of this very special schist. During the original construction tieback anchors were drilled 30 to 35 feet into the schist bedrock (located about 70 to 80 feet below street level). At the time of construction each anchor was thoroughly tested and found to be solid. After 911 when crews were repairing the slurry walls, they found that now the anchors would not hold. So they had to expose the area to find out why. What they discovered was that the bedrock was riddled with holes like Swiss cheese. This bedrock damage was discovered last summer, but only after a picture was circulated was the story about the glacier pothole concocted. Now the bottom of these potholes coincides with the bottom of the tieback anchors. I suggest that the holes including the 40 foot pothole were created not 20,000 years ago but seven years ago on September 11, 2001. The potholes look very much like the cavitation damage done to propellers. Here is an animation of the initiation of the collapse. Researchers are still puzzled by what happened. If we consider a phenomenon that is similar to a cavitating bubble, the light flashes, the shocks and secondary shocks will account for all the peculiarities of the collapse.
Compare the following video to this animation:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOcVz0xrp64 It was documented that many people high up in the WTC’s fell to a very tragic death. People believed they jumped, but those who fell to their death did not make a conscience decision to jump. They were pushed out. From the EMT Eric Hansen report page 3 there is the following quote: With this type of phenomenon a pulsing bubble as it expands creates a sphere of compressed air and it has enough force to hurl a human out of the building.
The smaller bubbles created during a secondary shock traveled and were capable of picking people up and carrying them a distance and were capable of destroying cars.
Seismic data from the WTCs indicates a large spike shook the ground just prior to each of the collapses. This is consistent with the release of a secondary shockwave from a cavitating bubble toward a boundary.
Watch the following video by Alfons and note where he says that the fall was faster than that of free fall, which means that there was a force like a cavitating secondary shockwave that pushed the building down toward the ground. Also note when he speaks of squibs and flashes of light consistent with hair jets and sonoluminescence associated with the smaller cavitating bubbles created at the initiation of the secondary shockwave. Video: http://www.technorati.com/videos/youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DCQBkLhHiGD4 Here is another video showing the flashes of light:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Huq0EM3aGkI&feature=player_embedded So the big question is what kind of explosion takes place in a cavitating bubble? The choices are mechanical, electrical, chemical, nuclear and matter-antimatter. In all but the last one, matter-antimatter, the explosions create a spherical blast wave that attenuates as the sphere grows. Only in a known matter-antimatter event like a gamma ray burst do we see the characteristic antipodal phenomenon. In the case of the WTC’s spike in seismic activity, there were no airwaves recorded --- only shallow ground waves --meaning no spherical blast wave. In both cavitating bubble and the WTC destruction there is a building of energy until there is a climatic event. In the drop a bubble forms and there it goes through a series of expansions and contractions until the final collapse with the then characteristic antipodal ejections. With the WTC there was first an explosion and then a time delay while the energy was building up until the final climax. In a large star a hypernova occurs when it begins to make iron in its core. Iron supports a magnetic field and it carries a current. So there is a growing as the magnetic field varies it creates electrical currents and as the currents flow they add to the magnetic field. One feeds the other and there is a ramping up until a critical point sets off the event. This phenomenon of delayed reaction is not involved with any other type of explosion (mechanical, chemical, electrical, or nuclear). With the other types there is a boom and then it is done. The time delay process only surrounds antimatter annihilation. Just as experts study explosions underwater, cavitating bubbles make this invisible phenomenon visible. What is it? In each bubble is a complex space charge configuration also known as a plasmoid or as ball lightning. Under the right conditions a pion is released from a nucleus. The pion is composed of a quark and an antiquark, which immediately annihilate each other producing a gamma ray burst. In the case of the WTCs the complex space charge was just like the cavitation bubble only larger and more dangerous.
|
|||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 31 March 2010 ) | |||||||||||
See 
| Next > |
|---|
