Most people are familiar with the official story of what happened on September 11, 2001.  It goes something like this:

          Four jetliners were hijacked by men with box cutters, and two of the planes were then flown into each one of the Twin Towers and a third was flown into the Pentagon.  The Twin Towers, weakened by the impact and fires, collapsed into a pile of rubble.  The fourth jetliner crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.  The FBI compiled a list of hijackers within three days.  Then a “retaliatory” attack was initiated against the Taliban in Afghanistan.  Then the US eventually attacked Iraq.

This story put together by the US Administration has not been tested, but has been put forth as the absolute truth. 

Due to a lack of responsible governmental investigation into the incidents of September 11^th, many alternative theories have arisen to fill the gap.  Since evidence that scientists would need to investigate the incident has willfully been destroyed and efforts towards a real investigation has been systematically thwarted, the alternative theories grow in number. 

There is evidence that flight 11 was still in the air after the explosion of the North Tower.

http://www.911conspiracy.tv/9-11_birds/David_Ray_Griffin_-_Phantom_Flight_11.pdf 

Next the official story has American Airlines flight 175 crashing into the South Tower at 9:03 am.  More evidence is available from several sources showing a variety of plane configuration and different flight paths. Planes do not melt into steel buildings without slowing down.   In every case the airplane in the video is a result of CGI (computer generated imagery). That is, it is clearly a fake. 

This is serious since the evidence implicates the U.S. Government and the media in a conspiracy to perpetuate a hoax on the entire world.

There is no evidence that implicates airplanes as the instruments that brought down the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001.  The black boxes were not found.  There are no pieces of evidence from any plane.  The National Transportation Safety Board denies making any positive identification of any of the planes supposedly crashed on 911. 

Also a live news report showed Flight 175 still flying 1 hour hafter it supposedly crashed into the WTC 2.

It is hard to read, but from http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399&st=0&gopid=10750647&#entry10750647 the information is:

UAL 175

319 439

B762

BOS 08:15a

LAX 01:44p

319= Flight level 31,900 feet

439 = Airspeed

This is a slide from the following video:

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=-fNloyNL88w

And

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdXGSefI6pM

(Thanks to and kudos to Genghis6199, Seatnineb, Matt and Steelers)

The following is a quote:

Speeds Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed

For Immediate Release by PilotsFor911Truth.org

        "(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - Much controversy has surrounded the speeds reported for the World Trade Center attack aircraft. However, none of the arguments for either side of the debate have been properly based on actual data, until now. Pilots For 9/11 Truth have recently analyzed data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board in terms of a "Radar Data Impact Speed Study" in which the NTSB concludes 510 knots and 430 knots for United 175 (South Tower) and American 11 (North Tower), respectively. A benchmark has been set by the October 1999 crash of Egypt Air 990, a 767 which exceeded it's maximum operating limits causing in-flight structural failure, of which data is available to compare to the WTC Attack Aircraft.

       "Egypt Air 990 (EA990) is a 767 which was reported to have entered a dive and accelerated to a peak speed of .99 Mach at 22,000 feet. Boeing sets maximum operating speeds for the 767 as 360 Knots and .86 Mach. The reason for two airspeed limitations is due to air density at lower vs. higher altitudes. To understand equivalent dynamic pressures on an airframe of low vs. high altitude, there is an airspeed appropriately titled "Equivalent Airspeed" or EAS[1]. EAS is defined as the airspeed at sea level which produces the same dynamic pressure acting on the airframe as the true airspeed at high altitudes.[2]

   "Pilots For 9/11 Truth have calculated the Equivalent Airspeed for EA990 peak speed of .99 Mach at 22,000 feet as the equivalent dynamic effects of 425 knots at or near sea level. This airspeed is 65 knots over max operating for a 767, 85 knots less than the alleged United 175, and 5 knots less than the alleged American 11. Although it may be probable for the alleged American 11 to achieve such speed as 430 knots is only 5 knots over that of EA990 peak speed, It is impossible for the alleged United 175 to achieve the speeds reported by the NTSB using EA990 as a benchmark.

       "Pilots For 9/11 Truth have further studied if a 767 could continue controlled flight at such reported speeds. According to the NTSB, EA990 wreckage was found in two distinct debris fields, indicating in-flight structural failure which has been determined to have occurred a few seconds after recording peak speed. Based on EA990, it is impossible for the alleged United 175 to have continued controlled flight at more than 85 knots over the speed which failed the structure of EA990.

        "Full detailed analysis, including analysis of a recent simulator experiment performed, and interviews with United and American Airlines 757/767 Pilots can be viewed in the new presentation, "9/11: World Trade Center Attack" available only at http://pilotsfor911truth.org. Although other factors come into play within the transonic ranges, Dynamic pressure is dynamic pressure. Math doesn't lie. Boeing needs to release wind tunnel data for the Boeing 767. Despite the fact that the data can be fabricated, such a release of data may alert more pilots and engineers to the extremely excessive speeds reported near sea level for the Boeing 767 in which they can decide for themselves."

Futher the impossibility of an aircraft doing what the official story says it did is shown in the following video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jop84CpeFrk

Evidence for no planes at the Pentagon.

Look for a plane in the following footage of the Pentagon.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD8Her7JUG0